بوبكاكي المجلد 1

81,173 98%

لمشاهدة الفيديو تحتاج إلى تمكين Javascript في متصفحك

456 / 9

Cumpilation of girls getting multiple cumshots on their tits or rubbing it in for extended periods of time.

تم النشر بواسطة Boobkake2007

فيديوهات ذات صلة

تعليقات

Boobkake2007 الناشر منذ 3 أيام

إلى Rochblue : "no you're trying to deem a bukkake as being the number of actual cumshots that squirt out of the guy's penis" - I wasn't, but linguistically that would indeed still be a bukkake. "Show me one professionally made dvd where bukkake is 1 cumshot" - never said there was one. "One guy cums on a partner is bukkake said no one ever" - correct. But a girl rubbing cum into her tits for a long time is, to me, in the spirit of BOOBkake

رد التعليق الأصلي

إلى Rochblue : "I'm somebody" - somebody who is mistaken about feeling misled. "You just don't care" - correct. "You copied & pasted the section you want your audience to hear" - I paraphrased what you said to save time, I am not doing this for an audience. "I'm not a busybody" - you're doing a good job of imitating one. "I'm not erroneous at all" - your analogies were. 1 or 7 guys nutting on a pair of tits is still cumming on tits. Missionary & doggy are 2 completely different acts.

Rochblue منذ 4 أيام

إلى Boobkake2007 : You: " "You're publishing videos to the world & falsely mistitling them" - that's your opinion" It's not an "opinion". It's a hard fact and I've proven that over and over again. "One guy cums on a partner is bukkake"....said no one ever!

إلى Boobkake2007 : You: " "Your boobkake is supposed to specifically represent. . ." - Lol I made the content so it represents what I say it represents, if you don't like it then don't watch & go make your own. " ...but you don't! That's my very point! I've made myself very clear that you in fact MISrespresent what the video states, per the misleading click bait titling. Round and round we go. I've already made myself perfectly clear that I'd be refraining from watching your uploads about a day or two ago.

إلى Boobkake2007 : You: " "What's not understood here?" - You don't understand that your analogy is completely erroneous, as I explained. The difference between a single cumshot on tits & what you imagine a boobkake to be it just the number of cumshots, the act itself is the same. Missionary & doggy are not the same act & are completely different." No, I'm not "erroneous" at all. A bukkake is a bukkake! I have even asked you to explain to me or show me specific examples that you can dig up of where the term "bukkake" is used in professionally published DVD's or something where it is being pertained to ONE male cumming on ONE partner. That's not "bukkake" at all. That's just a cumshot. Period. Oh God, now you're trying to deem a "bukkake" as being the number of actual cumshots that squirt of the guy's penis. Like, come on. Are you trying to now tell me that the number of squirts that a guy cums out per an ejaculation is now going to be "bukkake"? Again, I down right challenge you to find me labeled "bukkake" footage online (and I'm talking about published professional DVD's; not idiots online posting their own titles) that shows ONE guy cumming on a partner. Fact: You're not going to find it! And if you do, let me know.